You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
1064 lines
50 KiB
1064 lines
50 KiB
{
|
|
"bankCode": "WORKPLACE_ABILITY",
|
|
"bankVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"status": "LOCKED_FOR_IMPLEMENTATION",
|
|
"disclaimer": "本题库为自研工作情境题，用于自我了解和能力提升参考，不构成职业资格、正式招聘结论或永久能力标签。",
|
|
"questions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO01",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ANALYSIS",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "销售报表显示本月销售额增长20%，财务报表只增长8%。你首先会怎么处理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "核对两份报表的统计口径、时间范围和原始数据来源"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先取两个增长率的平均值作为汇报结果"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先使用财务报表，并注明另一份报表存在差异"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "采用增长率较高的报表，因为结果更积极"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 1, "C": 2, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "冲突数据应先统一口径并追溯原始来源。直接平均、择一或选择有利结果都会掩盖真正的数据问题。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 1
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO02",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ANALYSIS",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "一项新页面的转化率从10%升到18%，但目前只有20名访问者。你会如何判断效果？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "立即宣布新页面显著优于旧页面"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "扩大样本并与同口径对照组比较后再判断"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "继续观察，同时先把18%作为确定结论汇报"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "说明样本较小，只能给出暂定趋势而非确定结论"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 1, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "小样本波动较大，应扩大样本并设置可比基线。仅提示不确定性有价值，但仍不足以验证变化是否来自页面本身。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 2
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO03",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ANALYSIS",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "两份分析报告得出相反结论。以下哪组核查顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "比较结论→询问作者→补充少量数据→决定采用哪份"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "选择更新的报告→删除旧报告→通知相关人员→结束核查"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "统一指标定义→核对原始数据→比较分析方法→复算并形成结论"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先复算结果→再确认口径→挑选更可信作者→形成结论"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "先统一定义，再核查数据和方法，最后复算，才能避免在不同口径上比较结论。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 3
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO04",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ANALYSIS",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "必须当天决定是否上线，但关键用户数据尚未收齐。你会怎么做？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "直接按个人经验上线，后续再看结果"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "延期所有工作，直到全部信息完整"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "让职位最高的人直接给出判断"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "列明已知、未知和关键假设，选择可回滚的小范围方案并设置观察指标"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "信息不完整时应显式管理不确定性，并优先选择可回滚、可观察的决策，控制错误成本。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 4
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO05",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "CAUSAL_REASONING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "促销活动上线后订单增长了25%。如何判断增长是否主要由活动带来？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "比较同期趋势、对照群体并排查价格和流量等同时变化因素"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "活动和增长同时发生，因此可以判断活动有效"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "查看几条参与活动用户的正面反馈"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "只比较活动前一天和活动后一天订单量"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "时间上的同时发生不等于因果关系。对照、趋势和混杂因素核查能更可靠地识别活动贡献。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 5
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO06",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "CAUSAL_REASONING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "系统发布新版本后出现大量错误。最合适的第一步是什么？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "同时修改多个可疑模块，争取尽快碰到正确修复"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先控制影响并保留日志，再对比发布前后变化定位原因"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "立即回滚，但不保留现场信息"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "等待更多用户反馈后再开始处理"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "先止损并保存证据，再围绕版本变化定位原因，既控制业务影响，也避免破坏根因分析条件。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 6
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO07",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "CAUSAL_REASONING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "数据显示加班时间越长的团队交付量越高。你会怎样解释？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "说明加班一定能提升团队效率"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "建议所有团队立即增加加班时间"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "检查项目规模、人员数量和紧急程度等共同影响因素"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先承认存在相关性，但暂不据此做因果决策"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "交付量和加班可能同时受到项目规模等因素影响。相关性需要结合混杂因素和对照数据解释。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 7
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO08",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "CAUSAL_REASONING",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你要验证“缩短注册表单能提高完成率”。哪组步骤最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "修改表单→全量上线→观察总注册量→询问用户感受"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "提出假设→直接上线→发现变化→补写指标定义"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "观察历史数据→修改多个流程→比较前后总量→形成结论"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "定义指标→设置随机对照→只改变表单长度→达到样本量后分析"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "明确指标、设置对照并控制唯一变量，是验证页面变化与转化率之间因果关系的基本路径。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 8
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO09",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PROBLEM_SOLVING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你收到“把这个页面做得更好用”的任务。首先应该做什么？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "明确目标用户、具体场景、当前问题和验收标准"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先按常见设计规范修改一版"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "只询问对方喜欢什么颜色和布局"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "等待对方给出完整解决方案"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "模糊需求应先转化为用户、场景、问题和验收条件，之后才能选择合适的实现方案。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 9
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO10",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PROBLEM_SOLVING",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "面对一个复杂而陌生的问题，哪组处理顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "寻找现成答案→直接实施→发现问题→再定义目标"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "明确目标→拆分子问题→确定输入输出→逐项验证并整合"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先处理最熟悉部分→逐步扩大范围→最后确认是否解决目标"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先写完整长方案→交给他人执行→根据反馈决定是否验证"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "复杂问题需要先明确目标，再拆解和定义验证条件，避免局部工作很多却没有解决核心问题。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 10
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO11",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PROBLEM_SOLVING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你提出的方案试运行后没有达到目标。下一步最合理的是？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "继续扩大使用范围，以获得更多结果"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "认为执行人员没有严格遵循方案"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "对照预期与实际，检查假设、执行偏差和外部因素后再调整"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先暂停扩大，并收集失败环节的数据"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "方案无效时需要同时检查假设、执行和环境，而不是只扩大范围或归责于某一方。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 11
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LO12",
|
|
"dimension": "LOGIC",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PROBLEM_SOLVING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "负责人要求估算一个尚未完全明确的任务工期。你会如何回答？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "给出一个大致天数，并说明只是个人感觉"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "拒绝估算，等所有需求完全确定"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "参考类似任务，直接承诺相同工期"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "拆分已知范围，说明假设、区间、风险以及需要补充的信息"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "在不确定条件下，区间估算加上假设和风险说明，比伪精确承诺或完全拒绝估算更可执行。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 12
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO01",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "LISTENING_UNDERSTANDING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "对方提出一个比较模糊的合作需求。你首先会怎么回应？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "用自己的话复述理解，并确认目标、对象、边界和优先级"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "根据过往经验直接开始准备方案"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "发送一份通用需求模板，请对方有空时补充"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "要求对方想清楚全部细节后再来沟通"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "复述与确认能够尽早暴露理解偏差，同时帮助双方把模糊表达转化为共同目标和边界。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 13
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO02",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "LISTENING_UNDERSTANDING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "同事正在说明一次工作失误及其困难。你最合适的做法是？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "马上告诉对方正确做法，避免继续浪费时间"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先听完并复述关键事实、影响和对方需要的支持"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先听取主要内容，再提出自己的解决建议"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "保持沉默，让对方自己整理清楚"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "先完整理解事实和需求，再讨论方案，能避免把建议建立在错误假设上，也能降低对方的防御感。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 14
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO03",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "LISTENING_UNDERSTANDING",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "三方对同一需求理解不同。哪组沟通顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "各自发言→多数表决→记录结果→开始执行"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "负责人定调→其他人补充→形成文档→会后再澄清"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "分别复述理解→识别分歧点→对齐目标和证据→确认决定与责任"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "收集意见→整理共同点→由负责人决定→通知执行人员"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "先让各方显式表达理解，再定位分歧并对齐依据，才能形成真正一致且可执行的结论。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 15
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO04",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "LISTENING_UNDERSTANDING",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "客户表达不满，但没有明确说明具体问题。你会怎么做？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "先说明团队已经严格按流程完成工作"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "请客户提交正式投诉材料后再处理"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "直接提供补偿，尽快结束沟通"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "确认客户感受，再询问具体场景、期望和造成的影响"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "先确认感受并提取具体事实，有助于把情绪表达转化为可以处理的问题和期望。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 16
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO05",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "STRUCTURED_EXPRESSION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你需要向非技术同事解释一次系统故障。最合适的方式是？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "先讲业务影响和处理进展，再用通俗类比说明原因并确认理解"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "完整说明技术栈、日志和异常调用链"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "只说系统有问题，修好后再通知"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "省略不确定性，给出一个肯定恢复时间"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "面向非技术对象应从其关心的影响和行动出发，用适当语言说明原因，同时保留必要的不确定性。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 17
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO06",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "STRUCTURED_EXPRESSION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "发送一条需要对方行动的重要工作消息，应该如何组织？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "只写“请尽快处理”，减少阅读时间"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "说明背景、当前问题、所需行动、负责人和截止时间"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先给结论和行动要求，再附上必要背景"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "把全部聊天记录转发过去，让对方自行理解"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "清晰的工作消息应让接收者迅速知道为什么、做什么、谁负责以及何时完成。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 18
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO07",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "STRUCTURED_EXPRESSION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你需要指出同事提交材料中的严重问题。怎样表达最有效？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "直接说“你做事不够认真”"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "只修改材料，不再提及问题"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "描述具体问题、造成的影响、修改标准和可获得的支持"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "私下指出具体错误，并提醒以后注意"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "高质量反馈针对可观察行为和影响，并给出明确标准与支持，不把问题上升为人格评价。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 19
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO08",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "STRUCTURED_EXPRESSION",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "汇报一个延期项目时，哪组顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "说明困难→解释原因→请求理解→承诺尽快完成"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "汇报已完成工作→省略延期风险→等待追问→再解释"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "说明延期→列出责任方→描述过程→等待负责人决定"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先报结论和影响→说明原因与证据→给出方案→明确需要的决定"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "延期汇报应优先呈现事实和影响，再提供可验证原因、解决方案和明确决策请求。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 20
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO09",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "COLLABORATION_CONFLICT",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你与同事对方案选择意见相反。你会如何推进？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "先确认共同目标，再区分事实与偏好，用统一标准比较方案"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "请更多同事投票，按人数决定"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "暂时接受对方方案，避免影响关系"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "重点证明自己的方案更专业"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "以共同目标和一致评价标准处理分歧，能够把立场冲突转化为可比较的方案决策。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 21
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO10",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "COLLABORATION_CONFLICT",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "跨团队依赖已经延期。哪种沟通方式最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "在公共群指出对方延期→要求承诺→抄送负责人→等待结果"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "确认事实和影响→了解阻塞→共同制定新节点→记录责任和升级条件"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先私下询问进度→协商新时间→定期跟进"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "自行绕过依赖→完成后再告知对方"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "跨团队协作需要共同确认事实、阻塞和新承诺，并提前约定何时升级，避免指责或信息缺失。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 22
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO11",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "COLLABORATION_CONFLICT",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "同事临时要求你承担一项会影响原计划的工作。你会怎么回应？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "直接答应，之后再想办法补原任务"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "直接拒绝，因为这不属于原计划"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "说明当前承诺和影响，确认优先级并提出替代时间或资源方案"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先了解紧急程度，再决定是否帮助"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "边界沟通既要说明已有承诺，也要讨论优先级和替代方案，避免无条件接受或简单拒绝。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 23
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "CO12",
|
|
"dimension": "COMMUNICATION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "COLLABORATION_CONFLICT",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你发现自己的表达让对方产生了误解。最合适的处理方式是？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "详细解释当时为什么会那样表达"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "不再提及，避免让情况更尴尬"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先做出对方希望的承诺，之后再调整"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "承认造成的影响，澄清真实意图并共同确认修正行动"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "修复误解应同时处理影响、意图和后续行动，而不是只解释动机或给出无法兑现的承诺。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 24
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX01",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PLANNING_PRIORITIZATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "三个任务都临近截止时间，但现有资源只能优先完成一个。你会怎么做？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "按业务影响、紧急程度和依赖关系排序，并同步取舍方案"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "三个任务同时开始，尽量都推进一些"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先完成最容易交付的任务"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "等待负责人主动指定优先级"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "资源冲突时应基于影响、时效和依赖做明确取舍，并让相关方及时知道后果和安排。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 25
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX02",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PLANNING_PRIORITIZATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "开始一个跨两周的新任务时，你首先会建立什么？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "一份尽可能详细、覆盖所有可能情况的计划"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "明确交付结果、关键步骤、依赖、负责人和检查节点"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先确定最终期限和几个主要步骤"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先从最熟悉的部分开始，再逐步补计划"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "可执行计划要连接目标、步骤、依赖、责任与检查点，既能推进，也能尽早发现偏差。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 26
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX03",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PLANNING_PRIORITIZATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "需求范围比预计大，但截止日期没有变化。你会怎样处理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "保持原计划，靠加班完成新增范围"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先完成原范围，新增部分到期后再解释"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "评估新增工作量和影响，提出范围、资源或时间的取舍方案"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "记录需求变化，并提醒负责人可能延期"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "范围、资源和时间相互制约。范围变化后应量化影响并推动明确取舍，而不是默默承担风险。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 27
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX04",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "PLANNING_PRIORITIZATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "把一个目标转成可执行计划，哪组顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "列任务→安排人员→确定目标→检查结果"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "确定期限→开始执行→补充资源→最后验收"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "选择工具→分配任务→同步进度→根据结果调整目标"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "明确结果→拆分任务→识别依赖和风险→设置节点与验收标准"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "计划应从结果出发，再拆解任务、依赖、风险和验收节点，保证每一步都服务于最终目标。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 28
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX05",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "RISK_FOLLOWUP",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你发现一个依赖项可能导致项目延期。你会怎么管理这项风险？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "记录触发条件、概率、影响、负责人和应对方案，并持续检查"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "在周会上提醒一次，让大家注意"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先准备一个备用方案，但暂不告诉其他人"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "等风险真正发生后再处理，避免过度反应"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "风险管理需要可观察的触发条件、责任人和预案，并持续跟踪，而不只是一次提醒或被动等待。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 29
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX06",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "RISK_FOLLOWUP",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你的任务被另一个团队阻塞，且已经影响当前节点。你会怎么做？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "绕开对方直接修改其负责内容"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "说明阻塞事实和影响，提出备选方案并约定升级时间"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "持续跟进对方进度，同时调整自己可先做的工作"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "记录阻塞，等负责人下次检查时再汇报"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "处理阻塞不仅要跟进，还要透明说明影响、准备替代路径并约定升级条件，防止风险继续扩大。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 30
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX07",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "RISK_FOLLOWUP",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "项目进度看似正常，但关键任务一直没有可验证产出。你会怎么处理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "继续相信负责人汇报，避免打断执行"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "增加每日进度汇报次数"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "把关键任务拆成可验收的小节点，用产出和风险重新评估进度"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "要求负责人尽快提供一个演示版本"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "进度应由可验证产出而非主观百分比衡量。拆成小节点可以提前暴露真实偏差和风险。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 31
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX08",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "RISK_FOLLOWUP",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "线上发生严重故障时，哪组执行顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "查找根因→修改代码→通知用户→恢复服务"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "重启服务→观察结果→继续修改→故障后补记录"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "通知负责人→等待决定→组织排查→发布修复"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "控制影响→保留证据→同步状态→恢复服务→复盘根因"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "故障处置首先控制影响，同时保留分析证据并保持信息同步；恢复后再完成系统性根因复盘。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 32
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX09",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "DELIVERY_REVIEW",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "截止时间临近，但交付物仍存在质量风险。你会怎么处理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "识别关键质量门槛，缩小非核心范围，分阶段交付并同步风险"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "优先保证所有功能完成，测试可以之后补"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "继续优化细节，必要时到期后再解释"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "直接推迟交付，直到所有问题完全解决"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 0, "C": 1, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "临近截止时间应守住关键质量底线，并通过范围取舍和分阶段交付透明管理风险。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 33
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX10",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "DELIVERY_REVIEW",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "向他人交接一项进行中的任务，哪组顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "发送文件→说明截止日期→让对方有问题再问→退出任务"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "说明目标和现状→移交材料与风险→明确责任和节点→确认对方理解"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "口头说明主要事项→发送材料→约定一次后续检查"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "把任务重新做一遍→整理文件→通知对方结果"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "有效交接需要共同理解目标、现状、材料、风险、责任和检查节点，而不仅是发送文件。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 34
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX11",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "DELIVERY_REVIEW",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "任务完成后结果没有达到预期。最有价值的复盘方式是？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "确定主要责任人并避免再次由其负责"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "记录最终结果，提醒团队以后更认真"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "比较目标与实际，分析过程证据，形成有负责人和期限的改进动作"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "讨论主要问题并总结经验，供下次参考"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "复盘的价值在于从证据中找到可改变因素，并把经验转成有负责人和期限的行动。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 35
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "EX12",
|
|
"dimension": "EXECUTION",
|
|
"competencyTag": "DELIVERY_REVIEW",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "开发工作已经完成，怎样才算真正完成交付闭环？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "代码已经合并，可以把任务标记完成"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "部署完成且没有立即出现错误"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "把剩余事项记录在自己的待办中"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "按验收标准确认结果，补齐文档、监控、交接和明确遗留项"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 2, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "完成实现不等于完成交付；验收、文档、运行保障、交接和遗留事项都应形成闭环。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 36
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE01",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ACQUISITION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "第一次接触一项工作需要的新工具时，你会怎么开始？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "明确使用目标，阅读权威入门资料，完成小练习后应用到任务"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先看几个热门视频，再边做边查"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "直接在正式任务中尝试，遇到问题再处理"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "请熟悉工具的同事替自己完成关键部分"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "目标、可靠资料、小范围练习和真实应用形成完整学习闭环，能兼顾效率和风险。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 37
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE02",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ACQUISITION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "网上对同一技术方案存在互相矛盾的观点。你会怎样判断？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "选择点赞和转发最多的观点"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "比较来源、发布时间、证据、适用条件，并做小范围验证"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "优先参考官方文档，再结合一项实践案例"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "选择与自己原有经验一致的观点"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "可靠判断既需要评价信息来源和适用条件，也需要在自己的场景中验证，而不能只看热度或偏好。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 38
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE03",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ACQUISITION",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "快速进入一个陌生业务领域，哪组学习顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "收集大量资料→全部阅读→整理术语→开始参与工作"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "跟随一名同事→模仿做法→遇到问题再查资料→形成经验"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "明确任务问题→建立基础框架→结合案例实践→用反馈补齐知识"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "阅读概览→询问关键术语→尝试一项小任务→继续自学"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "围绕真实问题建立知识框架，再通过实践和反馈迭代，比无目标囤积资料更有效。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 39
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE04",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "INFORMATION_ACQUISITION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你只有两小时了解一个新主题并给出初步建议。你会怎么安排？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "尽量阅读更多文章，以覆盖所有观点"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "询问熟悉主题的人并直接采用其建议"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先写出自己的看法，再搜索资料验证"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "明确输出问题，优先权威概览和关键证据，并标明未知与后续验证项"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "时间有限时，应围绕输出目标选择高价值信息，并明确区分结论、假设和待验证内容。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 40
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE05",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "FEEDBACK_REFLECTION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你收到“方案不够清晰”的反馈。最有效的回应是？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "请对方指出具体难以理解之处，修改后再次确认是否解决"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "详细解释自己当时的设计思路"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "接受反馈，并在下一次方案中注意"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "找其他同事判断这条反馈是否合理"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "将模糊反馈转化为具体例子，并通过修改后的再次验证，才能真正形成可观察的学习改进。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 41
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE06",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "FEEDBACK_REFLECTION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "一次重要尝试失败后，你最应该优先做什么？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "立即换一种完全不同的方法重新尝试"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "还原目标、过程和关键决策，区分假设错误、执行偏差与外部因素"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "先记录失败现象和可能原因，再选择一个方向验证"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "等待更多类似失败出现后一起复盘"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "有效复盘需要还原过程并区分不同原因类型，避免在没有证据时只更换方法或延后学习。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 42
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE07",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "FEEDBACK_REFLECTION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "怎样最能验证自己真正掌握了一项新知识？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "能够完整复述资料中的定义"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "完成课程并通过课程自带的小测"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "能用自己的话解释、应用到新问题，并根据结果修正理解"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "尝试向别人讲解，并接受对方提问"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "真正掌握不仅是记忆，还包括解释、迁移、实践和基于结果修正认知。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 43
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE08",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "FEEDBACK_REFLECTION",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "根据反馈持续改进一项技能，哪组顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "收集反馈→一次修改全部问题→长期练习→最终检查"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "确定目标→大量练习→请人评价→记录结果"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "模仿优秀示例→反复练习→比较差距→继续模仿"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "设定具体目标→刻意练习→获得反馈→调整方法并再次验证"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "学习闭环应围绕具体目标，通过练习、反馈、调整和再验证不断缩小差距。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 44
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE09",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "TRANSFER_ADAPTATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "学会一种分析方法后，你遇到一个相似但条件不同的新问题。你会怎么做？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "识别共同原理和条件差异，调整方法并用结果验证"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "先按原步骤完整执行，再根据结果修改"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "重新寻找专门针对新问题的现成方法"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "认为条件不同，原方法没有参考价值"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "A",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 4, "B": 2, "C": 1, "D": 0},
|
|
"explanation": "知识迁移的关键是识别稳定原理与变化条件，并通过调整和验证把旧知识应用到新场景。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 45
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE10",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "TRANSFER_ADAPTATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你遇到一个自己长时间无法解决的问题，需要向同事求助。怎样提问最有效？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "把全部材料发给对方，请对方帮忙看看"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "说明目标、现象、已尝试方法、当前判断和希望获得的帮助"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "整理出最小问题、错误信息和已排除项后提问"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "直接请对方演示正确做法，自己跟着学习"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "B",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 0, "B": 4, "C": 2, "D": 1},
|
|
"explanation": "高质量求助能让对方快速理解上下文，也暴露自己的思考过程，从而获得可迁移的指导而非代做。",
|
|
"difficulty": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 46
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE11",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "TRANSFER_ADAPTATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SITUATIONAL_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "你熟悉的工具即将停止维护，团队需要迁移到新工具。你会怎么应对？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "继续使用旧工具，直到它真正无法运行"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "立即把所有工作迁移到最热门的新工具"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "比较需求和迁移成本，做小范围验证，形成学习与分阶段迁移计划"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "先试用几个候选工具并记录主要差异"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "C",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 1, "B": 0, "C": 4, "D": 2},
|
|
"explanation": "面对变化应结合实际需求、成本和验证结果规划迁移，同时安排学习，避免被动拖延或盲目追新。",
|
|
"difficulty": "HARD",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 47
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"questionCode": "LE12",
|
|
"dimension": "LEARNING",
|
|
"competencyTag": "TRANSFER_ADAPTATION",
|
|
"itemType": "SEQUENCE_JUDGMENT",
|
|
"stem": "制定一项与目标岗位相关的学习计划，哪组顺序最合理？",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{"optionId": "A", "text": "购买课程→安排时间→完成课程→更新简历"},
|
|
{"optionId": "B", "text": "收集热门技能→选择感兴趣内容→集中学习→寻找应用机会"},
|
|
{"optionId": "C", "text": "参考他人路线→复制学习清单→定期检查完成量→继续补课"},
|
|
{"optionId": "D", "text": "分析岗位要求和当前差距→设定可验证目标→练习应用→根据反馈调整"}
|
|
],
|
|
"answerKey": "D",
|
|
"scoringRule": {"A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "D": 4},
|
|
"explanation": "有效学习计划从真实目标和差距出发，用可验证练习和反馈调整方向，而不是以课程数量衡量成长。",
|
|
"difficulty": "EASY",
|
|
"discrimination": null,
|
|
"questionVersion": "ability-v0.1",
|
|
"source": "SELF_AUTHORED",
|
|
"active": true,
|
|
"position": 48
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
|